In Australia, the recruiters tend to think their way of thinking is the only way.
The eastern cultures emphasise on academic qualifications. Asians
reason that a person’s ability is proportional to the personal academic qualification.
The higher qualification a person has, the more skills the person has.
Unlike the Asians, western countries emphasise on work
experience and public speaking skills. The recruiters are not that interested
in a candidate’s educational background anymore. They are more interested in how
long the candidate worked in a similar position, and how well the person can
communicate. They reason that a person’s skill is gained from work, not from
studying. If a person has no work experience, the person has no working skills.
Ironically, in the past, the candidate selection criteria in
the western world were identical to that of Asian countries. Educational
background was highly looked upon. The selection criteria changed after the western
world started education export. In the English-speaking world, it resulted in
the mass intake of overseas students in the universities of US, UK, Australia,
Canada, and New Zealand, and these overseas students are mainly from north-east
Asia and India.
The sheer number of overseas students in the western
universities resulted in high marks are mainly achieved by overseas students
from Chinese cultural background who have no interest in sports and are weak in
public speaking. It seems to them that the only purpose of life is studying,
whereas students from the western culture prefer a balance between study and sports.
The only time when recruiters do not concern with the work
experience is during the graduate recruitment program, when recruiters mainly focus
on the candidates’ language skills, and problem-solving skills.
Interesting to see what will happen when Asians are not interested in studying in western countries anymore, whether the candidate selection will go back to the previous way of thinking.
No comments:
Post a Comment